NASIR AHMED versus MRS. ZAHEER
Section 4 (3) 15 West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance (III of 1962), Sections 10 and 15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Request for Removal of Territorial Jurisdiction to vacate Controller Transfer Request Houses The attempt was different from the one located in the territorial jurisdiction of the rent controller before the withdrawal requests were filed. On the tenant's objection to the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction, the rental controller, who filed the removal requests, referred the disclosure requests to the District Judge for transfer of the lease to the authorized area. The jurisdiction and the district judge moved the petitions to the rent controller whose tenants in the jurisdiction had challenged the rent controller's custody and charged the district judge with a transfer request when it was learned that the premises Areas not in the jurisdiction of the rent controller. The proper procedure for filing eviction applications was to return the eviction requests to the landlord in front of the jurisdictional rental controller, but the rent controller sent the district judge to the rental controller. Reference was made by referring to the legality of the source. And the requests for the transfer of the administrative decree, which was approved by the District Judge, did not suffer any legal error because under Section 4 (3) of the Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance 1979, the District Judge decided not to issue a case for rent. Was able to move from the controller to another legislature. District in respect of transfer of cases from one rent controller to another
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Kotli lawyer