Find a Lawyer

W.T.AS. NOS. 62/IB TO 64/IB OF 2001-2002, DECIDED ON 4TH APRIL, 2003. versus W.T.AS. NOS. 62/IB TO 64/IB OF 2001-2002, DECIDED ON 4TH APRIL, 2003.

Sections 23 and 35 Appellate Assistant Commissioner / Commissioner / Income Tax Commissioner (Appeals) state that the orders of the Wealth Tax Officer can correct the error and there is no law prohibiting the exercise of both powers simultaneously. Under the section 35 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963 and section 35 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963, which are separate and independent from each other, which have limitations in their respective fields, forums have a privilege to refer to the provisions by the parties. For appeals, the forum is always a high forum and the right of appeal is considered a fundamental right provided under the law, whereas for the sake of reform, the forum remains where the error in its own order is either motivated / lumped. Is corrected only if such errors are brought to the notice by someone else. Parties have no obligation to use both options at the same time. The law for the rights of the parties did not create any restriction to take advantage of both methods at the same time. Such treatment may be simultaneous or it may be a There may be one after the other because the forum that will take over matters. In the case of appeals and in this case the issue of renovation is different and the scope of correction is limited and the parameters and the extent of the test can never be equated to the decision of the unexpected order as made by the appeal forum. property advocates from Chak 4 b c lawyer