RANG MIRANI versus THE STATE
Sections 497, 233, 235 and 239 of the Federal Capital Criminal Circular, R7 (I), Chapter VII Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 324/353/427 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 17 (1) (4) bail, the grant of separation of the accused from the accused to the accused was in jail since his arrest and the charge was not charged in this case because the accused's case was being delayed. The accused was declared a dangerous offender and was not presented and the trial court, therefore, had shown its negligence and helplessness in proceeding with the case. If some of the accused were not present in the court, the rest Luzman's case could be set aside so that it could be decided soon that the accused could demand the constitutional right of the trial court to the provisions of Sections 233, 235 and 239. The PC trial court had the discretion to prosecute each and every accused separately. , But the discretion had to be exercised with justice, the trial court was ordered to stand aside for the trial of the accused, who was not present in the court so that he could be heard soon. The accused at the hearing could not file a case for a bail grant. The case of the accused be separated from. Proceed with the accused and so on
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Bewal lawyer