Find a Lawyer

TAGHIAL versus GHOUS BUX

Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/147/148/149 bail, the cancellation of the application for FIR was filed immediately within half an hour of the incident in which the fire was extinguished. According to the medical report of the accused, the deceased person was mentioned to have been injured and he had hurt both the accused and his co-accused fully supported the statement made in the FIR. Was confirmed and confirmed by medical evidence, there was a fireworks injury in the accident. His neck was attributed to the co-accused, but when the victim then tried to run away, the suspect fired at him who was accused of hitting his neck. Committed the murder and said that the suspected accomplices were fired. His pistol was near the victim and when the victim started to run away, the accused opened fire on the victim himself. All such facts showed that the accused had fully participated in the commission of the crime. After being involved in the case, with the full knowledge and assistance of the accused, he was not entitled to a trial because of his involvement in the case, the trial court had granted the accused's bail on the basis that It has yet to be determined. Which of the two injuries was known as the trial court's observation was contradictory to the facts of the case, as the victim said that he died of the injuries and that the victim was accused of setting fire wounds. was done. The accused's case was very clear that he wanted to kill the victim, the accused who had a joint intention divorce advocates from Dera Ismail Khan lawyer