Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFZAL ALIAS GAGGO versus THE STATE

Section 302 Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), Section 7 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 435/439 Omar, charged with delivering medical board to trial, he himself 18 Claimed to be less than a year old. At an early age, the plea that his trial should go to the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, the 2000 trial court referred the matter to the Medical Board for determining the age of the accused, the defendant challenging it During the course of the trial, the Investigation Police Officer announced that after taking into consideration the concrete evidence presented above the accused's age and after visiting the intermediate and secondary education fees, At the time of the commission, the accused's age was 17 years, 7 months and 21 days, and in view of the exact opinion of the police regarding the age of the accused, The spouse was unnecessarily referred to the Medical Board and the matter was to be presented to the Medical Board in accordance with Section 7 of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000, which provided that if any questions arose If the accused was a child before the court, the court said that after the investigation, they would find out which would include a medical report to determine the age of the child in relation to making the medical board mandatory, The order cannot be declared illegal and illegal because the accused's opinion has been requested that the police have already confirmed the age of the accused. There was junk. And the matter did not have to be forwarded to the Medical Board, it was repelled because the court was to inquire and the opinion of the police was not binding on the court. us immigration advocates from Kot Bunglow lawyer