MUHAMMAD ISLAM versus THE STATE
Section 302 (b) testimony was appreciated by two witnesses who improved their statements. The incident occurred in the dark hours of the night. If the eyewitnesses were present on the spot, they must have stated the exact number of casualties. ? But in this case it was not done on the occasion that three recovered empty reclaims of the crime were recovered, but none of the rifle retrievers was recovered on the suspect's identity, which was also a case in which the accused was arrested. Had gone in favor of was not charged. The accused, but he was accused of something other than that. The co-accused was acquitted by the trial court on the same evidence and his appeal was dismissed by the High Court, neither the pillow that was found stained with blood nor the girl on whom the investigating officer was killed. Occupied until the doctor admitted during a cross-examination that he was not reported to be lying straight on the post-mortem examination. , When papers were submitted by police, FIRs were not presented, presence of eyewitnesses was not mentioned in the site plan, firearm expert's report was negative, the suspect was highly suspected, Through the trial, the accused was convicted and set aside. And the accused was ordered released
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Madinah lawyer