Articles 230/4 324/392 / Anti 34 Counter-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997) Definition of Evidence Section 6, 7, 8 and 23 Evidence of the Anti-Terrorism Court In the present case, the accused committed the robbery in the present case. But when Wei was chased by the police and the public, they fired at the police party to protect themselves from arrest, which targeted two children who were at the scene of the incident, searching for the accused, under conditions. People did not suffer terrorism One part of the people committed robbery while committing robbery was a minor offense, but when they were in a different situation When fired, they fired with their weapons to protect the components of Section 6 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. The Anti-Terrorism Court had no jurisdiction to hear the cases, the accused was tried and convicted by the Anti-Terrorism Court, and the case was reopened. Section 23 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, was referred to the trial court for conversion to a regular court of jurisdiction over the matter.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
