Find a Lawyer

MRS. HAMIDA ALTAF versus LIAQAT ALI

The appeal against the charges against Sections 417 (2A) and 249A Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 408, 511 and 109 against the accused was that it produced duplicate keys of college lockers and shelters, and the same Gave to the watchman. In order to bring out and hand over the check books and other documents, the College said that neither the locks were set nor any of the locks and doors were brought out, as per section 11 by11. The crime was committed, the PPC was not complete. Therefore, as stated in Section 111111, PPC should have done some constructive work to complete the design; in the present case, the keys of the lockers and almshouses were reportedly handed over to the watchman. No movement. Although he may be charged in this direction, no attempt is made to prove the offense so as to enable him to be punished under Section 109, PPCX. Section 8, 8, could not be held liable for the offense under PPC as he was a college clerk or servant and no property was entrusted to him as a clerk and thus he was not guilty of any crime. There was no question of breach of trust or attempt to commit. Such a charge can be imposed in relation to such property, a conviction for such a crime cannot be imposed unless otherwise the witnesses of the two main prosecutions did not support the prosecution's version and were declared guilty. Given the evidence of the third witness could not be convicted. Even if the rest of the evidence at trial can be brought to the record, in such cases best advocate from Khyber Agency lawyer