ABDUL QADIR versus THE STATE
Applicants applying for the Sections 1 561A and 4 514 petition, withdrew the revised application by the High Court, and called back the approved order because there was no pressure. A party was entitled to perform his duties as an agent but nothing was on record to show that the applicant was barred from making any statement until the applicant returned the order. In which it was shown that the applicant's lawyer did not give the statement at all. Initially, but he debated the matter at length and then probably faced legal interference in the matter, he did not give this statement, thus raising the question of filing a memorandum. There was a misunderstanding when I encountered it. Considered and dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Kumbh lawyer
