Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM versus THE STATE

Section 497 (2) fornication of crime (enforcement hood) ordinance (VII of 1979), section 10/16 amendment code (XLV of 1860), section 420/468/471 bail, further investigation against the accused was Had testified. The marriage complaint of the alleged abductor and the report of the co-accused, the co-accused, the alleged abductor and the co-accused presented against each other, showed that the alleged abductor was presented as the accused. Because the FIR also revealed that during the investigation, it was discovered that he had nothing to do with the FIR, along with the alleged sexual assault or alleged kidnapping or adultery. It is further revealed that the accused was merely a witness of the marriage, which was allegedly abducted, on the petition for bail that he was accused of forging a false document. The certified copy of the file. The alleged abductor was married to the complainant, and according to the same complainant, the alleged abductor had been divorced in writing and after that she entered into a valid marriage. Whether the verdict was postponed or the question of the alleged kidnapper's marriage with the complainant was yet to be settled, further investigation came under the auspices of the accused, under section 497 (2). , The CCP suspect was previously convicted and was entitled to bail under the circumstances. famous supreme court advocate from Noorpur nooranga lawyer