Find a Lawyer

CH. LAL DIN versus TEHSILDAR SETTLEMENT

The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), in its constitutional petition, challenged the allotment of land under question in favor of the defendant, which was held regularly after a gap of seven years from its entry. Was scheduled for, without being postponed. Any material advances and then seven years later, it was decided but rejected for illegal prosecution. Applicants moved in with a delayed condolence request for their rehabilitation, notice in which the respondents In keeping with the status quo, it was said that the constitutional petition has been called for restoration. The hearing was decided after five years, but the legal heirs of the applicant were dismissed for prosecution without fresh notice, the applicants were not given a fair opportunity to be heard, and they were not granted It was heard that abortions are abortions. The issue involves the cost of disputing the rights of the parties, which should have been decided on merit rather than technical ability, especially when applicants have been pursuing their case for more than two decades. Was converted into an appeal and it was granted that the petition filed and delayed in the restoration of the constitutional application and their applications be considered pending before the High Court and the issuance of fresh notices and the parties as soon as possible. The decision will be made in accordance with the law of competence after providing an appropriate hearing opportunity . online advocate from Rawalpindi lawyer