Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AHMED SIDDIQUI versus ZAMIR AHMED TUNIO

Sections 52, Election 55 and Election 64 failed the petitioner's election challenging the Returning Officer and his agents in a fraudulent election with the Returning Officer and other election staff, thus strengthening the election. Corruption and illegal practices were committed. Representation was to request a definitive statement of material fact under section 55 of the Public Act 1976, with full statement of the possible names of the parties alleged to have committed any corruption or illegal act or any illegal act. ? Accused of committing such misconduct or illegal act or illegal act and the date and place of the commission of such proceedings or dates, but said that the facts were missing in the election petition, the applicant did not file the election petition Neither I provided nor in my statement, examples of allegedly corrupt practices Petitioner failed to check with his polling agents were present at the polling place or in the evidence along with alleged illegal practices in the election petition The affidavit, which was also in the ordinary course, was used to substantiate the alleged misconduct statement. There's no other person was present during the visit to the polling station or. The petitioner did not examine any of the election authority officials against whom he was accused of corruption. No new ground was available for the applicant, which could have led to the Election Tribunal ordering a re-enumeration. After the re-counting on the order of the Election Commission, the votes of the entire constituency due to the difference in votes will not be reported top advocates from Chilas lawyer