AL-ABID SILK MILLS LIMITED versus SYED MUHAMMAD MUDASSAR RIZVI
Specific performance of the negative commitments contained in the Letter of Appointment in Section 12 and 54 of the Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 27 of the Occupation of Pakistan (1973), Article 16 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), A XXXX, RR 1 and 2 The temporary injunction for the temporary injunction was that after leaving the employment with the plaintiff, the defendant would not join another institution of similar trade for 11 months when the claimant quit his job and the plaintiff of similar nature. Accepted another job at His request was that such a binding pledge be obtained under repression. Such a restriction agreement will be void and not void. The defendant did not choose to revoke the contract during the course of employment. Such a restriction cannot be regarded as unreasonable in terms of time and breadth. That is, for 11 months in the Home Textile Unit, this position did not prevent the defendant from securing employment in any organization other than home tax. In law, the tile unit, which was not challenged to prevent such infringement or its enforcement by judicial proceedings on any basis of the constitution, was violated by Article 16 of the Constitution or Article 27 of the Contract Act, 1877 The infringement cannot be considered as Pla Plaintiff offered three months. It was disclosed to the plaintiff that the High Court had approved the petition for a temporary injunction to be submitted to the court within a week.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
