Find a Lawyer

M. A. STAY NOS.252 TO 254/LB OF 2003, DECIDED ON 24TH APRIL, 2003. versus M. A. STAY NOS.252 TO 254/LB OF 2003, DECIDED ON 24TH APRIL, 2003.

Appellate Tribunal's appeal against an order passed under section 134 (1) (6) and section 66A of the 66 Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, after the stay of the appellate tribunal assessment, since the appellate tribunal appealed. Prior to the appellate tribunal's correct appeal before the matter was a subpoena, the appellate tribunal was not in a position to give effect to the issue, so the appellate tribunal was not the subject of the appellate tribunal. There is no unusual jurisdiction to come to an article which was not directly pending before the result of this order was granted under section 66A of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 unless the appellate tribunal itself. Once reached, it cannot be considered controversial or sub-auxiliary. An order under section 66A of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 that sought permission to stay by the appellate tribunal appeal was rejected by the appellate tribunal for lack of legal permission. top civil advocates from New Saeedabad lawyer