Find a Lawyer

AYAZ AHMED versus DR. NAZIR AHMED

Section 302 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 417 (2A) appealed against the acquittal and there was no previous hostility of the accused who was alleged to have cleared his pending TA / DA bills. Came to discuss which resulted in the exchange of hot words. He and the late had nothing on record to prove that the victim was killed or physically assaulted by the accused, or that any material evidence by the trial court could be misread or not read. Since this case cannot be identified, according to the records, it can be sustained. The reasons given by the trial court for the conduct of the accused in the collapse of a hard substance were neither ridiculous nor artificial, though a second opinion on the recovery of evidence may be possible, the appellate court finding itself. Could not change. The jurisdiction of the competent jurisdiction is required to interfere with the order of acquittal, which in this case was lacking even otherwise, the plaintiff's legal heir could not appeal against the verdict. There is no arrangement to be applied as an appellant in the criminal case, a petition filed by the victim's son said that the motive was not sustained. Dismiss in the circumstances lawer from fb area from Kotri lawyer