Find a Lawyer

MEMBER (COLONIES), BOARD OF REVENUE versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD

Sections 10 and 30 (1) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and the 1991 Constitutional application before the High Court, the approval of the allotment under the scheme of temporary cultivation, which is usually within the jurisdiction of the complainant. No, such allotment of the respondent was canceled by the Additional Commissioner remanded to the Assistant Commissioner, who during the allotment of the respondents allotted the applicant under the Central Atomic Energy Central Scheme as such. That the High Court had accepted the defendant's constitutional petition that the respondent, Such land was not included in any permanent scheme for which the applicant was in possession of the land despite his allotment to the applicant, the respondent having been unlawful for litigation for the last three decades despite this process. Was confused. The allotment was determined as a valid and valid leg. After the reverse weakness was identified in the inadmissible verdict, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and granted leave to appeal. family advocate from Ziarat lawyer