MUHAMMAD MOHSIN versus SAFDAR KHAN
A request for a 61-day restraining order hearing on AXXVI, R 2 and OV, R 3 review requests was heard by the secretary / court of the court for the wrongful name of his lawyer. Was mentioned which led to the return of the revised application. Over time, it was re-submitted after filing such an error request and obtaining a certified copy of the decision. If the request for review had been filed within time and the office had returned with objection, the applicant should have filed a civil and challenged the order of the Assistant Registrar. Under the Supreme Court Rules, 1980, the contentious appeal did not appear to have been filed by any application to correct the name of the lawyer in the title of the decision, the date of the return and only time to obtain such correction. The delay in offering was not enough to excuse the court from time to time, dismissing the petition as invalid.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Kotri lawyer
