Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANIF versus THE STATE

Applications for the accused in connection with section 9 (a) (iv), (V) and 10 criminal code of conduct (v. 1898), section 426, were mainly emphasized that their punishment according to jail records A large part has passed and since they had the exemption granted to them according to the law, they can be granted the same suspension of sentence as the Supreme Court allowed the main accused in the Supreme Court while in their appeals. The conviction of the main accused was suspended. It is considered that there is no possibility of hearing appeals in the future which, in the case of the applicants / accused, the bench had partially heard one of the appeals, it was not charged again, in these circumstances the petition Was justified in trying to apply. Rules were set out in the case of the train suspects; the premises that their appeals were unlikely to be heard in the near future were involved in the trial of the accused. In the case that they assisted / corrupted / assisted, the main accused had already been granted bail by the Supreme Court and one of the accused in the case was released on parole ground that the accused paid the bulk of their sentence. What, though, was not the only factor for his decision to adjourn the sentence, but in view of the specific circumstances, an indictment of the accused's conviction was presented, the defendant's request for his sentence suspended. , And his sentence was suspended. immigration advocates phone number from Ambela lawyer