Find a Lawyer

SABIR SULTAN versus ALI GOHAR

Sections 6 and 13 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O XX, R 5, O XLI, Rr 23 & 25 and section 151 remand of the case were dismissed by the first trial court, the plaintiff filed an appeal against the same appellate court. Prior to re-writing on the appropriate verdict and remanding the remanded case to the trial court for a separate trial on a separate issue pursuant to OX, R5, CPC. Based on the evidence filed, the plaintiff alleges that he challenged the appellate court's order in the review. The appellate court's verdict and ruling was contrary to law and it could not be declared factually and legally, that the appellate court had remanded the matter and had forgotten the principles of justice and justice. It was possible. In addition to his plea for further evidence, the plaintiff's assertion also claimed that the order of remand by the appellate court was not O XLI, Rr 23 and corred. 25, CPC and his application for further evidence may be allowed. Rule 23, AXLI, CPC cannot be prosecuted when the case is settled at the preliminary point of trial. Went and the appeal was reversed, the appellate court could get remand and there could be more. What matters or matters can be heard directly in the case in which the remand of Rule 25 of the O XLI has been obtained, the CPC is applicable where the appellate court can set up the cases and send them to the trial court. To which this Order applies best advocate from Daharki lawyer