Find a Lawyer

ADIL HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

Testimonies of Articles 6, 7, 8 and 9 appear to contradict the testimony of the prosecution's witnesses regarding this incident. An eyewitness said the incident happened at 8.30am and no witnesses were called by the public to witness the search. It was dark and no witnesses were available from the public. According to other witnesses, the incident occurred in the presence of several people at eight o'clock in the morning, but they were not called as they refused to be called witnesses. Were very clear. The difference between the time of the incident was not that of morning and day, but the courts of night and day had no obligation to blindly accept such contradictory statements, and they too were associated with capital in this matter. The conviction was not sufficient for such quality and evidence that the accused could be declared guilty and the trial court pronounced the sentence against them. Eh, in the circumstances immigration advocates phone number from FR Bannu / Lakki lawyer