Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SALEH versus QAMAR UD DIN

Article 12 and 27 (b) Convention of Conviction (10 of 1984), Article 72 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Agreement to sell the buyer without proof, without notice, by the courts below the plaintiff The final fact of the matter, which was the tenant of the landlord of the suit, alleges that the owner sincerely received the money, executed the sale agreement in his favor, and that made it more concrete. It was alleged that the owner had sold instead of executing the sale process in favor of the claimant. The plaintiff who knew the contract in favor of the plaintiff did not know the land of the suit, while the statement of the plaintiff and his witness was denied by the owner and other witnesses who presented it. The plaintiff's case was on a landlord who was a tenant who regularly paid share rent to the landlord, the trial court dismissed the case and the appeal and the judgment were upheld. In addition to the T-Court, the plaintiff from the High Court failed to substantiate his claim by adding cautious evidence and also to prove that the defendant, who was later a shopkeeper, from the sale on this suit property. The plaintiff was aware that the plaintiff himself could not prove that the latter was a seller aware of the sale of the suit property to any illegal thing that was brought down by the court and the conclusion that was made was lawful, reasonable and reasonable. Which hardly guaranteed any interference and was denied leave to appeal. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Kalaswala lawyer