MUHAMMAD KHAN versus NAZIR AHMED
The AXXVI, Rr 9 and 10 commissions deal with the two sides' clear understanding of the disputed land for local inspection, and the reference to the Kanigo dispute will be bound by their report, the trial court has said. Based on a report identifying the Commissioner's endorsement, the case was heard. The statements of the parties were disclosed, who referred to the matter legally as the referee and not only that the report of the local commissioner of Lango was as a referee's statement, which could not be considered as the report of the local commissioner and Nor can it be read as evidence. Case
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Gohar Ghoushti lawyer
