Find a Lawyer

NAWAZO versus THE STATE

Sections 513 and 514 were charged with bail bonds for which the applicant was on bail, the guaranteed bond was confiscated and the bailiff was ordered to pay the full bond amount. The court was present and on that day the applicant had requested in the trial court that the accused whom he guaranteed was likely to escape, so he could be detained, but the trial court arrested the accused. I failed and was discharged. The bail applicant further claimed that since he was only required to present the accused before the court before which he had executed the bail, he was not obliged to present the accused before the court. Where the case was moved, the trial court found it worthwhile. The accused persons should be directed to arrange for another bail and the applicant / bail be directed to appear at a later date. Neither the law's provision nor any opinion on the justification of the hearing was shown on the point that the court was bound to bail him out and to exclude him from his obligation, when he dismissed the bail. Then the guarantee will be binding until it is finished by them. The court will not in any way prevent the trial court from delaying the order on a bail application, however, it was within their discretion that they could obtain another bail at the hearing, demanding justice and interest. The suspects were allowed some time to arrange their latest bail because they were a prisoner under trial. advocates from Raiwind lawyer