Find a Lawyer

I.T.AS. NOS. 1876 TO 1878/KB AND 3830 TO 3833/B OF 2002, DECIDED ON 6TH AUGUST, 2002. versus I.T.AS. NOS. 1876 TO 1878/KB AND 3830 TO 3833/B OF 2002, DECIDED ON 6TH AUGUST, 2002.

Sections 156, 65, 59 (1) and First Schedule, Part IV, Parab (2) Order of Economic Reform (1 of 1972), Arts 7E (1), Ordinance of 7F and 7D Companies (XLVII of 1984) , Section 156 and Part VIII), Form A, Para 5 Error Correction Company's Rabbit Status claimed that the company was a public company and was assessed by the Department, then corrected under Section 156 and received The tax ordinance was reopened under section 65 of 1979. See the threshold period that SCCC was not a public company because most of its shares were not owned by the government but the corporation owned and the tax was much lower than that of private limited companies, before being reviewed. The majority of the shares were obtained by the review of the case. The federal government and then the PACO were considered to be transferred to the Federal Government and to fulfill the status of a public company including a company in which less than 50% of the shares by the government were appreciated by the government. Were placed under In accordance with Articles 7E and 7F of the Economic Reform Order 1972, provided in paragraph B (2) of Part IV of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, the Federal Government shall consider that the majority of the shares in a company Will keep In the event of gross interest or ownership interest in shares of such Establishment owned by the Federal Government and controlling voting rights by a federal government owned or managed entity, or controlling the ownership interest in an establishment, More than 50% of the total voting is in accordance with Parab (2) of Part IV of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Schedule 50% of the Company's issued interest in the financial interest of the Establishment. advocates from Tobatek Singh lawyer