Find a Lawyer

ALTAF HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

Section 302/109 Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (200x of XXXI), Section 2 (b) In an earlier case filed against the accused, the accused is 15/16 years of age at the time of the alleged incident in determining the age of the police. The petition, along with a petition before the trial court for determining the age of the accused complainant, included a copy of the birth registration in support of their claim stating that the accused was an adult and not a child. In the meaning of which the words of section 2 (b) have been assigned, the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000, which was filed by the relevant Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education. Depending on the matriculation certificate issued, he prayed that a medical board be set up to determine his age, the trial court accepted the complainant's request and observed that the accused was over 18 years old. The age of the accused was rarely mentioned by the police at the time of the alleged incident. B The age is indicated by the police. Police generally refer to the accused, which is often mentioned in the accused's external presence, who is usually the accused There was no exact age of birth registration in relation to the age of 20, which was included in the relevant union council records twenty years ago, Age was the most authentic and reliable evidence, especially when no definitive reason was presented to prove that such an entry was fraudulent or fabricated, it is only natural that when it was said twenty years ago It was said that the entry was included in the relevant record, no one could ever know that on the basis of the registration of the birth, the trial court had correctly determined that the accused's name at the time of the alleged incident. list of advocates from Chawinda lawyer