BASHIR AHMAD versus THE STATE
Clause 302 (b) / 324/148/149 The definition of evidence was immediately filed in the FIR and the accused was nominated in the FIR with specific role and it cannot be said that the case against the accused. The presence of both was recorded with consideration and consultation. On the occasion, the eyewitness who was injured and under medical examination cannot be doubted, who examined the eyewitnesses and said that the witnesses Injuries to the victims of the fire have resulted from the fire and it is stated that the wounds do not hurt themselves or are due to friendly hands. Even if some witnesses were not examined by the prosecution, such non-inspection was not fatal to the prosecution case, as it was of quality and not the amount of evidence necessary to prove the prosecution's case. Was when a prosecution case was established by the injured. There was no need to examine the witnesses, then other witnesses, on the occasion the presence of the complainant and the prosecution witnesses was sufficiently explained and there was no material contradiction in their statements to terminate their testimony. Mentioning the firearm injury rather than two-shot weapons on the victim would not indicate that the prosecution's witnesses did not observe the incident because the prosecutor alleged that he had not only been established. Was. , But also the ocular account presented by the defendant's witnesses was fully acknowledged by the motive and, through the alleged medical evidence, could not establish a family honor case which could be reduced to lesser conviction.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Sadiqabad lawyer