Find a Lawyer

JAN MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE

Section 497 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 337A (i) / 337F (ii) / 34 bail, the sanction of the accused's conviction was that the case against him was false and he was in the background of enmity in this case. Was involved. The accused, further disclosed in the FIR, further claimed that this was a three-issue case in which a judiciary was required for which no particular part was assigned and it was a matter of common allegation that the FIR had disclosed. What happened was that only sticks were used in this case and there was no automatic operation. Or any ordinary pattern used in the commissioning of a semi-automatic weapon offense. No crime was protected from the possession of the accused; the alleged crime was not proven, beyond seven years and that section 497 (1) ), Was included in the CRPC exclusion prohibited. The accused had been granted bail and the accused's case was similar to the case of the co-accused. The accused was entitled to grant bail in accordance with the principle of consistency. The State Council accepted the conviction and there was no objection. n If bail was granted, under the circumstances, the accused was admitted on bail how to become a advocate from Padidan lawyer