Find a Lawyer

SAFEER versus THE STATE

Section 417 (2A) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302 appeals against the evading principles Eyewitnesses involved in the FIR who have seen the accused / accused 4 fired, were withheld by the prosecution. And was substituted by new witnesses. On the second or third day of the incident, prosecution witnesses confessed that they were brutally beaten and brutally assaulted at the police station to request prosecution against the accused trial court in any case. There were good reasons for neglecting the recovery in the pending trial, and reports from the Chemical Examiner and Firearm Specialist, which were prepared and fabricated during the investigation of the case, that the murder of the victim was an unexpected event and involved the accused. The mere suspicion was made worse. , Was not sacred and if the reasons given by the trial court were speculative or artificial, or the results were based on any evidence or the result of a misinterpretation or misinterpretation of evidence, or the result of the accused's guilt or innocence. Was derived, which led to the misunderstanding of justice, which can also be interfered with in appropriate cases. In the present case, the trial court was not in any way artificial or artificial, justifying the interference of the High Court Prosecution in failing to establish its case against the accused, and the trial court correctly found that the victim. The reason for the involvement of the accused in the murder of the case is very high. The reasons for the trial-related suspicion which have been obtained from the evidence on record, it cannot be said that the case related to the trial. patent advocate from Sargodha lawyer