Find a Lawyer

ALTAF-UR-REHMAN versus SHAMS UL QAMAR

Section 115 and O IX, Rr 8, 9 Reject the Request for Illegal Prosecution The absence of a consultation was postponed to the request of the applicant's lawyer on all dates, except one, This review was previously excluded for non-prosecution. And it was restored in the interest of justice, and then the prosecution was re-terminated for non-prosecution. The lawyer seeking restitution of the application demanded that the affecting party cannot be relieved of its responsibility to run the case or seek to defend it by engaging in a lawyer. It is the court's duty to ensure that this case is dealt with promptly and promptly or defended. Any negligence by the lawyer was bound to the party which has no interest in prosecuting the request for review, the respondents cannot be indefinitely suspended in litigation. The High Court could not move even an inch due to the applicant's disqualification and the negligence of his lawyer since 1995. From now on, the petitioner's request was either to adjourn the case or to approve its restraining order. High Court refuses to reschedule review if there is no reason for the petitioner not to appear family advocate from Hujra Shah Muqeem lawyer