Find a Lawyer

INAYAT ULLAH versus THE STATE

Section 497 Preamble Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 bail, the complainant's grant who was the real son of the accused, filed a very detailed and comprehensive FIR against the accused, alleging FIR Accordingly, the accused told the victim to come out of his room, where the deceased along with his wife came out of the room, then the accused asked his other son to shoot the victim who had been convicted. Opened fire on the deceased and his wife, who both died there. There was not an encounter with the accused, but it was a commander in which Lalkar was telling his son to kill his second son and his wife. It was a double murder case in which the accused could not prove that the accused was at the age of 80. The accused's grandson executed the accused in his statement under section 161, CRPC accused. The case, which was declared an accused, was set aside and the accused was sentenced to jail in a hospice. Tall, but no evidence was presented in this regard No case was brought to approve the accused's bail, his bail application was dismissed law firms from More kunda lawyer