Find a Lawyer

MRS. UNSIA BANG versus SHELL PAKISTAN LTD

Section 9 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O XXXXX, RR 1, 2 and O VII R 11 suit for the dismissal of the plaintiff by the defendant and the applicant applying for a permanent injunction, which led to the occupation of the petrol station Had claimed. And they were dismissed by the defendants, they could not identify anything from the record that would allow them to request that they be in possession of the suit property claimant at a particular date, at least in that case. They could have offered a bill of payment. Regarding the suit property which was to be a petrol station, it was a commercial institution and could not be operated without the necessary utilities, such as telephone, electricity, drainage etc. which according to them remained in their original possession till the specified date in that date. In which the defendants allegedly deported them without their consent, even at the time of the proceedings in the present case, they were not in this position to put any evidence on record which they could prove to be ex. Plaintiffs have retained possession of the suit property up to the significant date, in which case, the plaintiff's case is settled. As is knocked together and there was no reason for them to action. Establish suit, do not show cause for action and be punctual with time, OVII, R 11, CPC allowed defendant's request and the plaintiff was dismissed. when you need a advocate from Kharian lawyer