EBRAHIM SOBANI versus NASEEM AKHTAR SOOFI
The application under A VII, R 10 and Section 12 (2) O VII, R 10, the CPC was completely dismissed by the Senior Civil Judge on the basis that the file of this case was transferred to the court by administration. Was received. Because the District Judge and his application for execution were not set up earlier, he was not given the authority to transfer the case / process request, which was why the court summarily dismissed the request. It cannot be declared a just and reasonable request. The order of speaking without being approved was dismissed in a slip way without proper use of the mind, making it inappropriate and unstable, in the present case. , Operated under O VII, R 10. The CPC, for the withdrawal of the application under section 12 (2), was to be presented in a court competent with this trial and execution and no request for transfer was made, thus, the order of the Senior Civil Judge. Was expressly subjected to misunderstanding and received a remand for a wrongful trial case filed under the Senior Civil Judge and A VII, R 10, CPC as well as the CPC transferred by the applicants. Will be considered pending and will be disposed of on merit, with appropriate orders as per the appropriate orders. The law after listening to the parties
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Tharparkar lawyer