MESSRS S. BROTHERS versus ASSISTANT REVENUE SUPERINTENDENT, CANTT. BOARD, MARDAN
The tenancy in the payment of rent by the tenant was signed by Section 3 (11) of the default board ownership and the landlord property board executive officer because the landlord appealed the lease against the tenant. Was filed by Assistant Revenue Superintendent of. The Board Record was silent on whether the Board's Revenue Superintendent was ever authorized to receive rent from the tenant, or in the absence of such authority evidence that the Assistant Revenue Superintendent was authorized to receive rent from the tenant. can do. The request for the landlord was unauthorized and ineligible for an Executive Officer of the Cantonment Board, named after the landlord and filed by the Assistant Revenue Superintendent for all practical purposes and, as such, had no locus standi / or There was no reason to take action.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Fateh Pur lawyer
