AFTAB SAHGAL versus KHURAM
The petition under Section 476 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application, the CCPC suit was resisted by the respondent on the petition filed by the applicants against specific performance, declaration and permanent injunction and OVII. , Under RR 10 & 11, there was resistance to filing an application by the defendant. The CPC, the civil court returned the claim that this case is not intact and the civil court case has no jurisdiction, the order of the civil court was finalized, though the petitioner did not challenge. Was. When the court has absolutely no jurisdiction over the respondents under Section 767676, CRPC, the action taken by it will be considered as very dark, illegal, void and the provisions of section 767676. , CRPC will not be responsive at this time. The matter had been objecting to the jurisdiction of the Civil Court in the matter from an early stage, at the end of which the object was retained. DePlante was returned by the court for lack of jurisdiction, which was a completely unnecessary exercise under section 767676, CRPC, which eventually ended after the defendant was acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Kachhi/Bolan lawyer