Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ALI HAROON versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF

Definition of evidence was an event of section 2302 (b) and the accused persons were designated with their specific role in the FIR, there was no evidence that the FIR was not listed carefully and in consultation. The witnesses of the complainant and the prosecution were natural witnesses and their presence on the spot was not possible. Such persons received a lengthy examination but nothing was brought to the record to dismiss their testimony. The seat of the wounds has proved that both injuries on the victim's body are independent and separate and were specifically attributed to both the accused. The availability of vacancies on occasion was also explained by the investigating officer. Both the complainant and the prosecution witness had no previous hostility to the false allegations of the allegations. The active participation of the accused persons was beyond any shadow of doubt Was also alleged to have a quarrel. Previously between the deceased and the perpetrator, who was the main architect of the ocular account presented by both witnesses, it was also fully confirmed by the motive and the medical evidence that There was no specific explanation given in the FIR regarding the crime weapon and the complainant made dishonest correction. , There was no power because the FIR stated that the suspects were armed with firearms and weapons of arms, because the weapons recovered from the possession of the accused were licensed under their names, the prosecution's case was completely But no one was against any doubt. After a thorough examination of the evidence, the trial court on the accused persons jobs for advocates from Feroz Walla lawyer