Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AJMAL KHAN versus SYED ASIF SHAH, INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE

Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Section 45 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Supreme Court Rules, 1978, the AXLVII contempt of court Supreme Court observed clearly under reference in the closing paragraph of its judgment. What was All the conditions were left at the trial court's sole discretion, which was the sole authorized forum for proceedings against the accused. If the latest material and old material were found guilty in the trial court's opinion, the Supreme Court did not observe it. Was. In its previous ruling that the court could revoke the accused's bail and hand them over to the police. The accused were also not released at the mercy of the police, but their fate was determined by the trial court's investigating officers. By their plea that the accused could be handed over to them and by no additional challan based on the latest material they had submitted to the trial court, both the Investigation Officers had already committed themselves to contempt of court. Was put at the mercy of the court, who was a young officer working under the influence of his superiors, so he was given the benefit of the doubt. And in the future, with the warning of caution, the contempt court acquitted, the contempt proceedings initiated against the defendant police officers were dropped. law websites from Sargodha lawyer