APPEAL NO.7(1246)/CE/ST/IB OF 2001(PB), DECIDED ON 7TH AUGUST, 2002. versus APPEAL NO.7(1246)/CE/ST/IB OF 2001(PB), DECIDED ON 7TH AUGUST, 2002.
The pricing angle for the purpose of section 4 (1) Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), Section 2 (46) for the purpose of duty and the angle of the provisions of section 2 (46) of the Sales Tax Act 1990, which Section 4 (1) imposes a sales tax on supplies made under section 3 of the Sales Tax Act 1990, as opposed to the concept of fair value for central excise purposes. ) In the Central Excise Act, 1944, Section 2 (46) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, it is assumed that it will consider the money, which includes all federal and provincial duties and taxes. The supplier receives the supply from the recipient for the supply but, in addition, the amount of such difference has to be kept in mind by the department, while simultaneously examining excise duty and sales tax.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Shahkot lawyer
