Find a Lawyer

MST. RUKHSANA KAUSAR versus THE STATE

The suspects also arrested the women along with the male accused against the accused persons, as per the Sections 497 (2) and 498 Offenses (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10/16 interim pre-arrest bail, and further inquiries. Who was legally the complainant's wife and the two then described the woman accused in the court that her complainant had never been married and had not legally married the male accused. She had brought before the Family Court a marriage credit case against the complainant, which is pending and she also filed a constitutional petition to end the criminal case against her which is pending. He was also told that no one affected him nor went away with him. And that she was living happily with the male suspect in charge of her free will, and the issue of consent had to be of two names, the real thing of which was the family court police work. Could have been considered just as appropriate by the side. Collecting material / evidence / evidence and not giving an opinion on the authenticity of the goodwill case regarding the accused, under the circumstances, were fully covered under Section 497 (2), CCP further investigation of his crime. Demanded, the accused was involved in the investigation In the circumstances, bail was already given to the accused, it was confirmed law firms from Sidhnoti lawyer