MUHAMMAD IMRAN versus THE STATE
Three persons were also injured in the incident, including defendants from the Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302 (b) bail, defendant, but his injuries were suppressed by the prosecution's injury and the injured. Was attributed to the accused. The prosecution's testimony was natural, in which the police officer in the court submitted that the order was issued by the investigating officer that a cross version should also be registered against the complaining party in which the accused did not touch the victim. The defendant was injured, including three persons, by the defense and his injuries were suppressed by the prosecution, the accused was allowed to bail under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Samma Satta lawyer
