Find a Lawyer

MANZOOR HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

Article 2 (2 (b) / 4) 334 The common intention of the evidence was established by the motivating prosecutor behind the incident, but careful examination of his statements proved to be credible and That despite the absence of an independent witness, the ocular account presented by them could be trusted when the incident took place on the roadside, it was not necessary for people to survive to see the events around it. Coming out of the homes of the accused was another piece of disclosure of the recovery of the weapons of prosecution. The prosecution could not prove that the participant was involved in the incident The minor defense version did not matter when the trial was heard after the testimony of the evidence was truly appreciated on the record. They came to a correct conclusion in assessing the date. Was still a verdict by the trial court in which an appeal for interference was dismissed without a trial court's decision on merit. patent advocate from Jhang lawyer