MOUR versus THE STATE
Ms: 498 and 497 (2) Prior to arrest, bail, further inquiry, was not merely the presence of the accused in place of the grant word, nor was it assigned to any witnesses, nor was he involved in the injury. It was specifically mentioned that he fired his gun in the air. Even a section of "Lalakara" or an altercation was not blamed for the incident, a record rivalry between the parties in relation to the incidents showed that a person washed away by the complaining party. And it hurt two people on the party and one person. The bodies of the two sides were reportedly lying in the ground adjacent to each party's land, giving the impression that each party was invading. Each party can seek the right of private defense, and in such a situation it remains. In order to determine which party was the attacker whose case requires further inquiry after being considered under Section 497 (2), CRPC, he was entitled to bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Tibba Sultanpur lawyer