Find a Lawyer

AURANGZEB versus THE STATE

An inquiry police grant came to the conclusion that the accused was present, under investigation by Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 bail, Senior Police Officers, a Section P and Additional Section P. was not. On the spot with his co-accused and that he did not charge the accused against the accused. The charge was found to be false, but since the prosecution's witnesses insisted on the suspect's involvement, it was placed in column number 2 of the challan. The court's mercy was not binding on the police, although the investigation was strange. It could also be considered in the circumstances if they were based on the statements of witnesses during the inquiry, and the benefit of the opinion based on the speculative and speculative opinion given by the police to the accused along with the material factors that the accused was found in the body of the deceased. Only one injury was declared on the non-critical part of the body, which was easy in nature, as was the case between the parties referred to in the FIR. Because of the enmity, the scope of false accusations cannot be denied by the complaining party involved in the case, in which case the accused has long been behind bars and consequently did not challan. was done. After the arrest, the accused was able to make a case for bail, the bail could not be stopped and the accused's case came under further investigation under section 497 (2), the CC confessed to the accused on bail. Gone, conditions famous lower court advocate from Morgah lawyer