Find a Lawyer

MIAN SHER BAHADAR versus CIVIL JUDGE, TAKHT BHAI

Sections 13 and 15 of the Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Preamble and O. XVII, R 3 Applying the Civil Code of Conduct attacking the tenant's defense for non-production of proof of proof, 1908, at the end of the landlord's proof Subsequently, the tenants were provided with evidence provided to the tenant, but nevertheless they were given numerous opportunities, including several last chance, the tenant failed to produce evidence, the tenants failing to present the proof to the tenants, Tenants withheld tenant defenses Tenants challenged the rent controller's order that the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code Are. 1908, the tenant controller, OXVII, R 3, did not apply to the case before the CPC but could not be applied to the CPC case, however, the West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance 1959 applied to the proceedings. was not. But the basic principle of the CPC shall be to the rent controller to comply with the absence of any special supply contrary to this order. The rent controller had the discretion to comply with and apply the CPC provisions if he was not In the event of an unnecessary situation, in the present case, a special provision for the rent controller provided tenants with sufficient opportunities to present their evidence, but they failed to take advantage of the order. Excuse or other rent controllers, to delay land harassment on every postponed date. And XVII, R 3, turned on the PC right and stopped the tenants defense. immigration advocates from Khairpur Nathan Shah lawyer