The prosecution's case against the accused accused of defining section 2302 (b) was based solely on his confessional statement, and on the positive report of the accused's firearms expert Judicial confession recorded by the magistrate, also the certificate attached to the confession. was not. In the hands of the magistrate, which was made mechanically without the request of the free mind, the medical report did not support the confession of the accused motive, which was not proved by the prosecution given in the confession that it was alleged The confession made by the accused, however, was neither voluntary nor true, and after he was withdrawn, no basis for pistol punishment could be made and the police sent him to the recovery and firearms specialist. After 22 days the crime vacancies were maintained. Such delays also had a profound impact on the conduct of the investigating officer, or the investigation found dishonesty, so the positive reports of the firearms specialist could not be relied upon in which the police recovered the crime. , It was also suspected that the accused had been acquitted under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
