Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NOOR HUSSAIN versus MUHAMMAD TAJ


Under Sections 12 (2), 96 and A. XXXVII, R 4, the former decree, while putting the affidavit in evidence, proceeded against the defendant against the former party and the plaintiff gave the affidavit. The trial was ordered on the basis of previous party evidence. A special order was passed by the trial court that the earlier evidence should be given by affidavit; in the absence of any specific order by the trial plaintiff, the plaintiff's affidavit had no clear value, so that The witnesses should have come to the witnesses' room for support. The case was heard but it did not conduct a judicial examination itself and the order passed by the trial court was set aside and the application was read with section 12 (2) under A. XXXVII, R 4, CPC. Was, the CPC was remanded to the trial court for judgment, the appeal was allowed accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
when you need a advocate from Barkhan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.