Find a Lawyer

SARFRAZ ALIAS MIDO versus THE STATE

Section 302 (b) / 324 / 337f (iii) the definition of evidence was immediately filed with the FIR and the accused was designated with special character, though he had a dual weapon, but by the accused. It was admitted because of the presence of the prosecutor's witness. At the scene of the incident, the defense's defense cannot be doubted that the complaining party was the assailant, unreliable because no one was injured by the accused, which was proved by medical evidence. The prosecution's case was established against the defendants beyond any doubt by presenting the prosecution's case and defense request to the court, to interfere with the prosecution witness's indictment by the trial court. No cause was disclosed, the accused was acquitted and the accused was not acquitted. The co-accused was not a case of death sentence on the principles of safe administration. While maintaining the conviction of the Ian of Justice, he was sentenced to life imprisonment by the trial court, leading to the injury of the prosecution witness. His conviction and conviction were not declared a crime under Sections 242424 and 7337, PPC. Responded negatively tax advocates from Malakwal lawyer