Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

I.T.AS. NOS.301/IB, 302/IB, 309/IB AND 310/IB OF 2001-2002, DECIDED ON 12TH MARCH, 2003 versus I.T.AS. NOS.301/IB, 302/IB, 309/IB AND 310/IB OF 2001-2002, DECIDED ON 12TH MARCH, 2003


Section 108 (b), 141 and 142 of the total income and failure to supply certain statements were imposed by section 139, with the initial penalty imposed on each month and under section 142 of the income. Tax Ordinance, 1979 Idity Provides a validity of up to Rs 2,000 per day plus a fine equal to Rs 200, during which the default requires careful scrutiny. No further fines were appropriate under the action and the same order should have been imposed after completing the other regulatory rules, and if the Assessing Officer had not yet entered the required statement, the Assessing Officer would have had more opportunity to evaluate. There should have been additional fines per day after that. Was set to default under Sections 141 and 142 of the Income Tax Ordinance;

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
solicitors from Kurram Agency lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.