Find a Lawyer

PUNJAB PROVINCE versus MUHAMMAD ARIF

Sections 20 and 39 Litigation Act (IX of 1908), Sections 5, 14 and 2 (7) of the West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance (II of 1962), Section 18 Arbitration Agreement, Request to Appeal to Court Against Order False Forum The time I spent before the Additional District Judge's court against the civil court's order, after the trial court's term expired, was filed by the defendants in the High Court on October 12, 1999. Reverted, Defendant was filed on July 16, 1999 due to lack of legal jurisdiction and was immediately appealed to the High Court on 10 1999 1999, the respondents did not file any petition for contempt. Of late, the limitation for filing an application under section 115 was 90 days, and the appeal against the trial court's order could be filed in the High Court, within the limits the state claimed that the trial court erred in responding to the wrongful trial. Will benefit. In Sections 5 and 14 of the Limitation Act, 1908, the Respondent did not show reason for the respondents of the High Court not to file the appeal within the limitation period; Due to the non-preference of appeals before the appropriate forum in the scope of Section 14 of the Limitation Act of 1908, the respondents had to show that they had, in good faith, appealed to the wrong forum under the District Judge. Of legal action. Section 18 of the Orders of the West Pakistan Civil Courts, 1962, had no jurisdiction to hear appeals against decrees of more than Rs. The lawyer's claim shall not be dealt with in good faith as it was not done with proper care and diligence and the section on the Limitation Act, 1908 famous high court advocate from Dera Nawab Sahib lawyer