Find a Lawyer

RIAZ AHMAD versus THE STATE

The testimony of the complainant and the prosecution witness was hacked directly by the complainant and the prosecutor's witness, which was recorded by the police who had no time to compile a false story. Nevertheless, despite any scrutiny, there was no reason for his testimony. There was no evidence in the record that the ocular account was fully supported with the help of medical evidence. In the event that an illness exists between the accused and the complaining party, only one casualty was previously inflicted on the victim by means of a weapon. The deadly weapon records and circumstantial evidence prove that the incident did not occur in the fight of passion after a sudden fight without the appearance of a fight and that the accused was of no avail. And did not act in a cruel or unusual manner. Merit did not press his appeal against the trial court's decision, but prayed for the reduction of the sentence and for section 2302 (b). The sentence awarded to the accused, PPC was changed to section 2302 (c), PPC and the trial court sentenced the accused to life imprisonment. That is, the duration of the period already served by the accused will be fulfilled. In the case of justice female advocates from Jacobabad lawyer