HAMID versus THE STATE
The testimony of the prosecution witness who presented the ocular account and told about the recovery of the testimony of section 2 (c) was neither related to the deceased nor had any ill will of the accused, He said that the prosecution's witness was a victim of indecent complaints, though he was from the deceased, a straightforward account whose voice was accurate and prompt in the collar account. An FIR was registered as well as facts related to the recovery of the rifle, with medical evidence accompanying the rifle. Auxiliary version of the ATA, it was alleged that it was properly convicted by the trial court, was justified in claiming that the appeal against the trial verdict was not pressurized. At the time the accused was approximately 20/21 years old, there would be no previous rivalry or illness among the deceased and the accused was notorious in the company of friends and guests about whom the deceased joked about a ccused. , Who was severely subjected to provocation, was not only a grave, but suddenly he had a rifle lying in his room to call the accused. Red blurred and fired on the accused, who did not file an appeal against the judgment of the trial court, prayed for the reduction of the sentence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Rabwah lawyer